Natural Disasters are Not All Natural

Deruelle, Fabien (2023) Natural Disasters are Not All Natural. Journal of Geography, Environment and Earth Science International, 27 (11). pp. 74-94. ISSN 2454-7352

[thumbnail of Deruelle27112023JGEESI108644.pdf] Text
Deruelle27112023JGEESI108644.pdf - Published Version

Download (520kB)

Abstract

For a half century, the military has been developing technologies to turn climate and extreme environmental phenomena into weapons.

This study is a literature review, which was conducted with the following objectives: 1/ to expose the known powerful military technologies of climate and environmental modification; 2/ to emphasize that many extreme environmental events observed in recent years coincide with the effects that these military technologies are able to generate; 3/ to analyze the conclusions of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) on the origins of the increase in natural disasters.

The literature used comes from official sources: peer-reviewed scientific articles (except one); patents; intergovernmental organizations; military documents; policy documents; university documents; national newspapers; news agencies; writings by respected scientists in their fields.

Results of the literature review reveal that HAARP (High-frequency Active Auroral Research Program), the most powerful ionospheric heater in operation, is able to influence climate. High-power electromagnetic pulses in the earth's crust, produced by a mobile magneto-hydrodynamic generator, is a technique developed since the 1970s to trigger earthquakes. Directed energy weapons, a real technology, can ignite destructive fires at range. For several years, official documents report effects on health and the environment similar in all aspects to those that would be detected if solar geoengineering by stratospheric aerosol injection, a climate-altering technique, was used. Due to numerous biases and a lack of objectivity, the IPCC's arguments on the causes of the growth in extreme environmental phenomena (heat and cold waves, storms, hurricanes, tornadoes, droughts, floods, wildfires, air pollution, etc.) are flawed. The solar hypothesis isn't appropriate either, given its low activity for several years.

In conclusion, the use of military climatic and environmental modification technologies appears to be the most relevant explanation to understand the increase in natural disasters over the last 20 years.

Item Type: Article
Subjects: Pustaka Library > Geological Science
Depositing User: Unnamed user with email support@pustakalibrary.com
Date Deposited: 11 Nov 2023 04:35
Last Modified: 11 Nov 2023 04:35
URI: http://archive.bionaturalists.in/id/eprint/1861

Actions (login required)

View Item
View Item