The Controversy of Views About Health Service Quality Between Health Provider and Patients With Bpjs Insurance:A Case Study in Mamami Hospital – Kupang

BACKGROUND: The latest challenge of hospital service system in Indonesia now adays is the controversy of views about health service quality between health provider with patients andfamilies. Patients as the ultimate assessors measure the quality from medical care started up to the patients get cured without any physical defect. Mean while, the health providers as the health suppliers see the quality of health service from the using of medical scientific standard up to the curing of sickness.

PURPOSE: The paper analyzes the controversy of health service quality between the Providers and patients in Mamami Hospitaluse BPJS (Badan Penyelenggara JaminanSosial) as a Social Insurance Administration Bureau in Indonesia.

METHODS: Observational survey with cross sectional. Independent variables: sympathy and empathy, interaction, environment quality. Dependent variable: health service quality. Variables measurement: Likert scale. Population and sample: BPJS inpatient for 3 days in Mamami hospital. Sample number: 200 respondents taken with purposive sampling.

RESULT: The three independent variables effect health service quality. Significant point of sympathy and empathy (β = 490; α = 0.00); environment quality (β = 180; α = 0.48); interaction with patients (β = 233; α = 0.18).

CONCLUSION: Controversy of viewseliminated in modern health service system. Mixed service between medical care and cognitive service is the answer. The providers come in and get inpatient service in the room for patients with psychological deficiency. The mixed of service have impacts in the change of patients’ status: from consumers to customers. The resultant for health service institutions is profitability.